Securities and Exchange Commission v. GLR Capital Management, LLC, GLR Advisors, LLC, John A. Geringer, and Relief Defendant GLR Growth Fund, L.P., Civil Action No. 12-02663

SEC FILES CHARGES AGAINST TWO OTHERS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FUND MANAGER'S $60 MILLION SCHEME

Recently the Securities and Exchange Commission filed additional charges in its case against a Northern California fund manager accused of running a $60 million Ponzi-like scheme.

The SEC previously charged the fund manager, John A. Geringer, with defrauding investors by touting imaginary trading profits instead of reporting the actual trading losses he had incurred. The agency today sought court approval to add charges against Christopher A. Luck, of Scotts Valley, Calif., and Keith E. Rode, of Franklin, Wisc., who along with Geringer were principals of GLR Capital Management LLC, which managed the GLR Growth Fund, L.P.

The SEC alleges that GLR Capital deceived investors into thinking that the fund was earning double-digit returns by investing 75 percent of its assets in highly liquid investments tied to well-known stock indices like the S&P 500, NASDAQ, and Dow Jones. In reality, the fund was heavily invested in two private, illiquid startup companies, and Geringer's trading for years had generated substantial losses. Luck and Rode sat on the boards of directors at both startup companies.

According to the SEC's amended complaint filed in federal court in San Jose and subject to court approval, Geringer in April 2009 confessed to Luck and Rode that he had been lying to them about the balances in the fund's trading accounts. This alerted Luck and Rode to the fact that contrary to what Geringer had been telling investors, the fund had not been achieving returns of more than 17 percent by investing 75 percent of investor money in the stock market. Instead, the lion's share of investor funds was invested in two private startup technology companies.

The SEC alleges that, despite Geringer's confession, Luck continued to solicit new investors for the fund by touting Geringer's trading ability and providing investors with fraudulent marketing materials claiming that the fund had earned between 17 and 25 percent annual returns in every year of the fund's operation through investments tied to major stock indices. Rode, a certified public accountant, continued to mail account statements to investors that contained grossly inflated cash balances that deceived investors about the fund's liquidity. Several investors made additional investments in the fund and rolled over their investments for additional one-year periods after receiving these fraudulent account statements.

The SEC further alleges that Rode provided investors with account statements that falsely claimed "MEMBER NASD AND SEC APPROVED." The SEC does not "approve" funds or investments in funds, nor was the fund (or any related entity) a member of the NASD (now called the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority - FINRA).

In addition to the allegations in the original complaint against Geringer and the related entities, the SEC's amended complaint alleges Luck and Rode violated or aided and abetted violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The amended complaint also alleges Rode violated Section 26 of the Exchange Act, which prohibits persons from claiming the SEC has passed on the merits of a security. Additionally, the SEC seeks financial penalties, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, permanent injunctions, and other relief from both Luck and Rode.

Contact Us:

With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.

At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.